Maybe you heard that a sometime (now former) ESPN.com blogger was let go as a freelancer earlier this week after he blogged somem pretty, insensitive things about the earthquake disaster in Haiti on another web site, FlipCollective.
Paul Shirley is a pro basketball player (most recently in Spain) and writer. The controversial blog, titled "If you rebuild it, they will come," remarked that he had not donated to the Haiti relief effort and is not planning to.
"I haven’t donated to the Haitian relief effort for the same reason that I don’t give money to homeless men on the street. Based on past experiences, I don’t think the guy with the sign that reads “Need You’re Help” is going to do anything constructive with the dollar I might give him. If I use history as my guide, I don’t think the people of Haiti will do much with my money either..."
"My wariness has much to do with the fact that the sympathy deployed to Haiti has been done so unconditionally. Very few have said, written, or even intimated the slightest admonishment of Haiti, the country, for putting itself into a position where so many would be killed by an earthquake."
Shirley raises a point and a position that often comes up when discussions of poverty arise. Namely, "Shouldn’t much of the responsibility for the disaster lie with the victims of that disaster?"
Or, restated, if people are homeless (or hungry, poor, on welfare, on food stamps, etc), it's their own fault (because they are lazy, didn't work hard enough, think they are entitled to something for nothing, etc).
I don't begrudge Shirley his opinion or the blog that allowed him the forum to state them. I wholeheartedly believe in the worldview (stated here by Voltaire) that "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
In fact, Shirley raises some valid points about the ineptitude of the Haitian governemnt -- albeit buried amongst a bunch of insensitive statements (such as a proposed letter to Haiti from the rest of the world reading, in part: "...Could you not resort to the creation of flimsy shanty- and shack-towns? And could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?")
(Photo courtesy www.welt.de)
Yes, there is such a thing as personal responsibility, but most often, people living in awful circumstances are doing so not out of choice but out of necessity. They live in flimsy shacks because their only housing options are flimsy shacks.
If you are constantly concerned where your next meal, your next bill payment, your next ride to an appointment is coming from, you are trapped in what sociology textbooks like to term "the tyranny of the moment." Meaning you are not concerned with getting ahead, but just getting by. And getting by probably means making do with living in a flimsy shack and just being happy your family is living through the day, the week, the month, the year -- and hoping that a disasterous setback -- whether natural disaster or losing your job -- doesn't happen.
Not to mention that Haitians are not suffering because they lived in flimsy shacks. They are suffering because a natural disaster -- the great equalizer -- struck. Doesn't matter how nice of house they were living in. Case in point: Among the collapsed buildings were hotels, mansions, even the presidential palace. (One could possibly argue that living in shacks might have saved people -- less weight/structure to collapse on top of them??)
When first reading this blog, I was tempted to assume that Shirley led a charmed, upperclass American life -- born into wealth, perhaps an east-coast upbringing with an Ivy League education, untouched by any true knowledge of or experience of poverty conditions. But he was born in a midsize California town, grew up in smalltown Kansas and went to Iowa State. It's still possible he had no contact with poverty; I don't know his experiences.
But regardless of the underlying governmental issues in Haiti that Shirley rightly criticizes and the poor choices that some poor people do make, aid is needed NOW to cover basic needs, like food, water...survival. Before the controversy of funneling donated relief aid to rebuild the country right back into its old mistakes even comes into play, the people of said country have to survive long enough to get to that point.
(Shirley has since responded to the criticism here.)
(Photo courtesy of byfaithalone.org)